Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Railways

are the one option to tackle traffic congestion in big cities around the world.

Therefore

, governments should allocate a budget for building

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

railways

rather than

roads

. I agree with

this

statement, and the following examples will be provided in order to support my point of view. One of the most important reasons why governments should spend money to build

railways

rather than

roads

is that

railways

could be more efficient

supporting

Change preposition

in supporting

show examples

increased demand since populations tend to increase in many countries.

For example

,

according to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

a survey conducted by Bangkok University,

it

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

revealed that the population has been slightly increasing over the

last

decade whereas the

roads

have been built more than 10 connected-ways around the country, which wasted more than 100 million baht. While the traffic jam still exists. Another reason to support

this

is the fact that building

railways

would be less natural degradation than building

roads

.

This

is because there is less deforestation for building

railways

. To illustrate

this

, in recent news, it has been reported that 80% of forest areas in Nakhon Nayok have been changed to be

roads

, whereas 20% of forest areas have been used to build

railways

at the same distance.

This

shows the fact that

railways

less destroy nature. In conclusion, both

railways

and

roads

are useful to people,

therefore

the way to choose the better one should consider many factors which suit the individual

geographic

Replace the word

geography

show examples

of each country.

This

will be well worth the money which the government should spend.