Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Options are divided as to whether raising the cost of gasoline is the best direction to solve the problem of traffic congestion and climate pollution. In my opinion, it would

defi- nitely

Correct your spelling

definitely

show examples

make the matters worse if the cost of

fuel

is increased. There are several reasons why I would argue against the impact of increased gasoline

prices

on car users.

First

, higher

fuel

prices

will result in inflation in every respect,

includ- ing

Correct your spelling

including

show examples

salary, food

prices

, travel expenses, commodity

prices

, and even the interest rate.

This

means that people will still use their automobiles because they have a higher income to compensate for the increased

fuel

price. With

this

scenario, traffic conditions and

pol- lution

Correct your spelling

pollution

show examples

emissions will remain the same.

For instance

, in Thailand, the number of personal automobiles increase every year,

although

the government would have been controlling by increasing the fare of gasoline.

On the other hand

, there are other approaches that may be more efficient and effective. I believe that the problem is better tackled using electricity-powered vehicles and a prop- er public transportation system. It helps reduce the amount of carbon dioxide carbon and encourage people to use their personal vehicles.

Moreover

, the government should invest more in repairing and maintaining roads as well as constructing new roads to solve the problem of traffic congestion.

Furthermore

, the scientists should search for the source of clean energy

such

as solar power and nuclear power to replace the fossil

fuel

. In conclusion, I believe that things would get worse if the price of petrol is increasing.