If a product is good or it meets people needs, people will buy it. So it is unnecessary and no more than an entertainment to what extent do you agree or disagree?

A segment of society believes that if the quality of a product is excellent

then

no advertisement is required because customers will purchase it without any publicity.

Therefore

, spending money on commercials is not needed and it will only fulfil the purpose of amusement. Personally, I disagree with the aspect and reasons for the same will be discussed

further

. The

first

and foremost reason for the disagreement is that in today’s time, there is a flood of

products

in the market. Definitely, to boost the sales of a particular good it is mandatory to publicize the commodities along with their prominent features.

In other words

, commercials play a vital role in the selling of items as it is solely the way through which recently launched commodities, as well as, upgraded versions of the previous ones can be acknowledged by the public. To illustrate,

initially

Add a comma

,initially

show examples

the sale of the Himalaya brand was declined, but with the launch of the modern range of

products

and efficient advertising, the company has a turnover of millions at the current. Ergo, up-gradation of items is the demand of time. Undoubtedly, to retain insight of purchasers adverts ought to be displayed at a regular interval, irrespective of the fact that it caters the requirements of individuals .Indeed, people prefer to do experiments with the latest items despite its standard .

For instance

, the purchase of Dhara Ghee was skyrocketing in the ’90s, but later ,on declined in the sale due to the arrival of new

products

in spite of its top-notch quality because of lack of advertisement.

Thus

, to overpower the market, it is mandatory to broadcast the ads regularly. In compendium, in

this

contemporary scenario, not only does the quality of the

products

matter

instead

, how effectively it is broadcasted ,counts.