Animals are in danger of extinction. Some people say that we should protect only those animals which are useful to humans. Do you agree or disagree?

Every species in

this

world including

humans

is a part of an environmental cycle. Some people say that we should only save those

animals

which are beneficial to people in their daily life, which is true.

However

, I disagree with the claim because other

animals

are

also

for

nature

balance.

Humans

are depending on some of the

animals

such

as cows, buffalo, goats, camels and so on. But wild

animals

are

also

a part of the environment. In the environmental ,cycle every animal are depending on another one, one way or another. We know that deer feed from the grass or tree and it becomes food for the line. After the death of a wild animal its prey mixed with the soil of the earth.

This

creates fertilizer which is useful for grass to grow and again ecosystem begin from grass and it's a continuous process. In

this

process there are many other

animals

including wild

animals

are essential for keeping

nature

stable.

Moreover

, keeping all the

animals

safe will help

humans

in another way too.

For instance

, there are many incidences happened recently, wild

animals

such

as lions, tigers are coming outside from the jungle and they are making target the human as their food source.

This

is happening because they are unable to find food in the forest.

Hence

, if we protect all the

animals

in

this

world

then

these problems can be solved.

However

, there are some negative points of saving too many

animals

. If the number of forest

animals

becomes more they release from the jungle and hunt the people of the societies. So it cannot be tolerable if

animals

number become unstable it directly affect

nature

and the cycle become uncontrolled. To recapitulate, it's the responsibility of

humans

to protect all the

animals

in

this

world. Which can keep

nature

is stable and treat them equally.