as is often that "Prevention is better than cure". For this reason, governments should spend national health budget more on the prevention of diseases than on treatment. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is that that the authority should invest in the national health budget on the

prevention

of illness rather than the treatment because "

Prevention

is better than cure". I completely support

this

idea in terms of many and prospects.

First

and foremost, the cost of

prevention

is far cheaper than the therapy. Looking more closely, these days, the illness caused by daily customs is focused between youngsters.

This

is because their unhealthy life is possible to generate heavy diseases

such

as cancer in the future.

Therefore

, they must consider their health, and if they have unstable customs, it should be amended to protect their forthcoming life.

Additionally

, students are able to understand the healthy diet, the importance of sleepness, and workouts in their school as a class, so, it can say that the government already educates young generations about

prevention

.

Secondly

, teaching about diseases

such

as HIV is the only way to defend against genetic illnesses. The therapeutic treatment is not found with regard to illnesses as HIV and AIDS.

However

,

this

is able to prevent by paying attention to the risk. Thereby, all those should understand about

this

disease, and if they have opportunities to learn about it, they probably enable take care about it after

this

class. To sum up, the investment in

prevention

is effective in that of treatments in order to reduce the cost of future care.

Furthermore

, the public improves their healthy lifestyle which connects to be a long life and remain shape without heavy illnesses.