Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argued that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both point of view and give your own opinion.

It is clear that there is no doubt that every country has

crimes

and punishments for that. Despite some

people

assert that there should be exact punishments according to the

crimes

done by

people

, others accepted that decision of the punishments depends on the conditions of a particular

crime

and the offenders how to commit the

crime

. In

this

essay, I will explain both sides of the argument in detail and provide my opinion. On the one hand, some

people

agreed that penalizing should be specific depending on the types of

crime

.

In other words

, the fixed penalty can help to reduce the number of

crimes

.

For example

, offenders can realize the law and regulations, and punishment encourages them to think again and again before they commit the violets.

Therefore

, nonadjustable punishment can give a solution to control the number of

crimes

and some

people

accepted it.

However

, others admit that offences should be reckoned as per the situation of personal

crime

and reason for committing as for self-defences.

For instance

,

people

have to commit offences in order to protect themselves in some cases.

Therefore

, every court has enacted self-defence law in every country for self-protection and

people

claim that

crime

should be judged as per situations of commitment. To conclude,

although

the penalty of violation can be considered according to the reason of offending, in my opinion, each type of

crime

should be nonadjustable punishment to decrease and control

crime

rates.