In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe that money should spend on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In recent decades, the transportation infrastructure and vehicles have evolved significantly so the quality of travelling increase. Now, there is an argument in some countries that the cost should be spent on developing existing public transport or the new type of vehicles
such
as fast trains, especially between two cities. In my idea, indeed, the current transport facilities need to develop and it should be prioritized. On the one hand, some people that think the government should invest more in new fast track and railway maybe need it more because they have a daily commute and spend a noticeable time travelling.
Although
using faster public transportations have some advantages, the allocation which should be invested in the new railway constructions and produce the fast train is more than developing the existing vehicle. Thereby, if the authorities want to construct fast line infrastructure, they should spend a large part of the annual budget on it for a couple of years while it can be spent on other public services.
On the other hand
, public transportation, which is used now in most countries, infrastructure a couple of years ago by means of old technology that need to be developing and
also
need to repair because maybe damaged due to using in a long time.
However
, by spending fewer amount of money, the old public transport facilities are predicted to fix and it would be more beneficial for citizens and improve the quality of their daily travels.
In addition
, if the old transportations are not developed, those will be damaged and do not use in near future. To conclude, I think that it would be more beneficial for governments and people as well if the specific budget spend on developing existing public transit
instead
of building a new railway and fast line because the former action needs less money and time as well.
Submitted by mgolnari6 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: