Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It cannot be denied that the cost of renovating old
buildings
is a great financial undertaking, requiring funds that could be spent elsewhere. Whilst it is important
build
Add the particle
to build
show examples
new housing and roads in
cities
, I don’t think
this
should be at the expense of maintaining and renovating our old
buildings
. Our old
buildings
are a link to the past, part of our cultural heritage. Replacing old
buildings
not only ruins the aesthetics of our
cities
but means some architectural styles will be lost forever.
Additionally
, these
buildings
are important for our younger and future generations to learn about the past and a source of enjoyment as people revel in their diverse and often pleasing architecture.
Furthermore
, these
buildings
are
also
tourist attractions. They bring tourists into
cities
, benefitting the wider community and contributing funding to their maintenance.
This
contributes to the countries economies and
are
Change the verb form
is
show examples
therefore
not always
such
a burden to city spending budgets.
Moreover
, many people actively raise funds for these
buildings
and
this
should be widely publicised to encourage more members of the local community to get involved in preserving their heritage.
However
, we cannot deny that our
cities
are expanding rapidly as more people move for either work or relocate from other countries. We
Add the comma(s)
, therefore,
show examples
therefore
need new housing and effective transport systems.
This
should be carefully considered to avoid turning our
cities
into ugly concrete jungles, maybe emanating the styles of the old architecture we have in place.
Furthermore
, care should be taken that the plans consider the environmental impacts so as not to damage our environment. Overall, I think money should be spent to maintain old
buildings
. We need to see the bigger picture, old
buildings
bring in revenue, so we should assess their value to our local economies. They are our heritage and should be maintained and new developments should complement our diverse architecture.
Submitted by sophiecherry72 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: