“The internet never will replace traditional course books in school”. How far do you agree with this prediction?

These days a lot of

books

are published in two tools, which are paper and the

internet

. Despite, reading

books

on the

internet

is becoming popular, for school-aged children, conventional paper-based

books

may be more suitable than web-based. Staring a

screen

for long hours isn’t good for their eyes and general wellbeing.

First

and foremost, paper-based textbooks give us more real imagination and feeling because the human brain responds a variety of actions to real paper-based statements compared to read texts on the

internet

.

Therefore

, there is an enormous difference between abstract and real paper-based

books

for gaining knowledge.

For instance

, in my case, I can’t read a long article or news on the

internet

due to the fact that my attention isn’t fully concentrated on the

internet

environment.

Furthermore

, we access the

internet

through cell phones or computers,

thus

we have to look at a blue lighted

screen

in order to catch up the data or news. Staring a display for long hours affects our brain and eyes. Some studies have mentioned about negative influences of the blue-lighted

screen

on our health and brain

such

as it causes sleep deprivation and drops our quality of ability to see. So, we should select a safer mode for our physic rather than a harmful option for learning. Having considered the potential issues, I’m not in favour of getting knowledge through the

internet

because of possible the harmful effect caused by a

screen

and the risk to students’ health. It seems that reading mini-articles and news on the

internet

is more suitable for adults.