In the present day, the power of nations has been conducted by different governments and authorities which leads to an immense variety of types of leadership.
Although
some governments give more voice to the population, others are completely different and both there are positive and negative sides. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss both sides and explain which of them outweigh.
On the one hand, if the world were conducted only by one government, certainly there would not be a plethora of discussions about essential topics, since the leader would not need to listen to the other leaders to address the problem, Linking Words
in other words
, saved time in Linking Words
this
topic could be used to tackle other situations. Linking Words
For example
, in any situation Linking Words
that is
incredibly complex to give a voice for everyone, as people are different and have different ideas; Linking Words
therefore
, the voice of the majority would be kept, resulting in disapproval of some individuals.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, when authoritarianism reaches power citizens lose their freedom and in some cases their rights. Linking Words
Furthermore
, the only government conducting the world could promote ancient beliefs and old fashion traditions completely opposite the modern age in which we live. Linking Words
For instance
, the planet with the leadership of Afghans not only would take off the rights of women but Linking Words
also
solve the problems through the usage of weapons, resulting in a nation completely without freedom and unsafety. For these reasons, the advantages do not outweigh the disadvantages; Linking Words
therefore
, the way more democratic and fair is that each country has its own leader.
In conclusion, becoming a democratic leader is a complex process but is completely necessary in order to keep order and vital functions. Linking Words
This
essay discoursed about two sides and explained in detail which of both can be more positive.Linking Words
larissafelipin