Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Issues related to the national budget are frequently discussed these days. It is argued that due to the limit of government funds, it should be offered in terms of building

railways

Use synonyms

better than roads. I truly agree with

this

Linking Words

assertion and the explanation will be discussed in the following paragraphs. The principal reason to consider is that the railway's project is a powerful tool for addressing overpopulation problems in urban areas. In fact, most

people

Use synonyms

have to stay in big cities because of nearby their offices and seek jobs. To explain, mass

transportations

Use synonyms

need railway stations as well as employees at the stations.

Hence

Linking Words

, the improvement of

railways

Use synonyms

has great results in the local economy as well as living areas.

For instance

Linking Words

, citizens can live in their villages and go to their workplaces by using speed trains since

people

Use synonyms

can easily access rural areas than before. Another point is that

railways

Use synonyms

have a positive impact on the environment.

In other words

Linking Words

, public

transportations

Use synonyms

,

such

Linking Words

as train and sky train, offer a huge number of

people

Use synonyms

moving with these transports. If most

people

Use synonyms

opt to travel by mass transportation

instead

Linking Words

of private cars, the quality of air will be better than today. To exemplify, the Siberian route train is one of the attractive routes for backpackers because of its pure nature along the trip. All things considered, I am of the opinion that

railways

Use synonyms

transportations

Use synonyms

have a positive impact on citizens rather than roads.

Therefore

Linking Words

, individuals should support as well as share feedback with their governments in order to enrich

transportations

Use synonyms

in their countries.