Some people think that because children find subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult, they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree?

There are a few

lessons

teaching in the mandatory mode in primary schools while it is apparent that some

subjects

, which are mathematics, philosophy and so on, are tough for early aged

children

. I will explain my opinion that why I believe that these kinds of hard

lessons

should be an optional mode for school-aged learners.

First

and foremost, we must consider core difficult sides to learn these compulsory studies, early aged

children

might be not ready for understanding that kind of too abstract

subjects

because catching main ideas of mathematics and philosophy requires more brain capabilities due to the fact that

children

these subject can’t be touched by

children

’s hands.

Furthermore

, school-aged

children

are good at

subjects

doing by their hands compared to the mentioned studies.

For instance

, I used to love my painting lesson as a child due to the fact that I draw real things I saw.

Secondly

, these mandatory findings need more concentration and time because they are tough to understand, and pupils spend a lot of time to achieve their base score.

Thus

, they don’t have enough time to learn other curious

subjects

.

As a result

of

this

, learners may become feel unenthusiastic about their school and drop their desire of studying.

For example

, I think it is a reason for pupils to absence their

lessons

because they might be not eager on studying

this

kind of difficult ones. To sum up, educational organizations should give an opportunity “which type of findings to learn” for

children

and parents. Particularly, at an early age schools should raise the desire to learn for pupils. Maybe, compulsory

lessons

are more suitable for adolescents because these fundamental

lessons

are essential for their future careers and prospects