The advocates of international aid believe that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while the opponents consider it unnecessary, because money is misspent by the governments that receive it. Discuss these two points of view and give your opinion.

There are controversial perspectives heating a debate over worldwide aid. While a number holds a strong view that due to the moral obligation, it is necessary that nations should help each other, the opposite makes a statement that the governments can misspend the

money

if they do that. I would contend that the former may do more good than harm and the latter is invalid due to a number of underlying reasons. On the one hand, international assistance needs to be taken into consideration due to the fact it brings tremendous benefits. In the fast-paced society, a plethora of undeveloped

countries

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

incapable of tackling their own issues ranging from education, economics, poverty, especially healthcare.

Therefore

, the assistance of more powerful and developed

countries

will provide a stable foundation for

such

countries

to maintain their growth pace. More importantly, undeveloped nations can not come out from

this

crisis if the more powerful society refuse to assist them.

For example

, Covid-19 is still a severe problem and in

this

tough situation, Vietnam is a developing country and lacks adequate medical facilities and vaccines to combat the epidemic. Fortunately, Vietnam has received aid to supply vaccines from America and England with the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine with a view to minimizing the number of fatalities

as a result

of the pandemic.

Hence

, due to

a

Correct article usage

the

show examples

myriad of redeeming features it brings, it is undeniable that

countries

should be willing to assist one another in their prosperity.

Although

the merits of international support are widely acknowledged, some people argue that

this

money

can be put to better use for personal reasons.

Nevertheless

,

this

is completely ungrounded and improbable. The donor and aided

countries

will make joint promises, and the governments of both

countries

will have control over how the subsidies are spent. Having that

money

will allow it to be put to good use and will help to alleviate that country's problems.

Therefore

, there is no cause to suppose the

money

will be misappropriated in the receiving country. In conclusion, international aid plays a significant role for some undeveloped

countries

if there is an agreement between the two parties ahead of time.