In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Many individuals argue that the construction of quick speed
train
railway lines should be prioritised even though it costs a huge amount of money. Some people believe that the development of current public
transportation
should go
first
. While some individuals think that the very fast
train
is urgently needed, I would argue that it would be better to improve the existing
transportation
system in advance. On the one hand, it is generally believed that high-speed trains would be beneficial for connecting cities in more efficient ways. As a matter of fact, people can easily go to a neighbour city for business matters or just a simple vacation.
For example
, Jakarta citizens can reach Bandung for just one and half hours with a specialised fast
train
, which is twice faster than the existing
train
or highway route.
However
, the construction of
this
advanced vehicle needs a huge amount of money, which is funded and treated as debt by some foreign companies.
Hence
, the government should limit the high budget and fancy investment and spread the budget to more impactful sectors.
On the other hand
, it is
also
argued that the existing public
transportation
system should be improved
first
. In fact, more people use the current public
transportation
instead
of the high-speed
train
.
For instance
, a Jakarta family tends to ride their own car through highway toll when having a trip to a tourism destination place in Bandung, since they usually ride around and explore many sites in that area.
In addition
, the
transportation
cost of the existing
transportation
,
such
as public buses or trains, is relatively cheap for some travellers compared to the advanced
transportation
.
Therefore
, it looks like the government should splash some cash to develop the current public transport. In conclusion, it seems to me that it is better to improve and rejuvenate the existing public
transportation
first
,
although
the construction of high-speed trains would be beneficial in the future.
Submitted by rizkyhidayatbloem on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: