Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

There is a clear difference in wealthiness among

countries

. Some are very rich while others are quite poor. In my opinion, while it is the governments' task to provide their citizens with basic needs, I believe that more developed

nations

should

also

assist undeveloped

countries

to achieve better living conditions. On the one hand, the government has a great responsibility for its own community. Because the government collects several taxes from individuals, it should invest

this

money to improve its population's living conditions.

However

, in many

countries

,

such

as Brazil and Nigeria, the serious problem of government corruption prevents the money to be invested in crucial needs, which results in negative issues for the country, namely food insecurity, poverty, and violence.

Nevertheless

, if these taxes were wisely applied,

then

people could have access to better education, a satisfactory health system, and even wellness.

On the other hand

, considering that wealthy

countries

usually rely on poor

nations

to grow, they should

also

help

countries

in need.

For example

, developed

countries

normally exploit natural resources from poor

nations

, which negatively impacts their biodiversity.

In addition

, industries from rich

countries

establish their business in less developed

countries

, leaving many environmental impacts to the area,

such

as air and water pollution.

Hence

, helping citizens from poorer

nations

is the minimum wealthy

nations

should do. In summary, social inequality among

countries

is a challenging problem.

However

, if governments truly invest in their own

nations

and if rich

countries

help poor

nations

,

this

problem can

be certainly lessen

Change the verb form

be certainly lessened

show examples

.