The advocates of international aid believe that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while the opponents consider it unnecessary, because money is misspent by the governments that receive it.

In

this

day and age, worldwide

support

has never ceased to provoke debate among people. While some claim that

countries

have an ethical duty to help another, the opposite side makes a statement that it is unneeded since money is misappropriated by governments that receive it. Personally, I would contend that international

support

may do more harm than good and the latter is invalid due to some underlying reasons. Without a shadow of a doubt, global aid is of paramount significance because of redeeming features it brings about. In fact, there are several

nations

that do not have sufficient ability to resolve their severe problems on their own ranging from politics, society, environment, especially healthcare which is the convincing justification why they need the backing of numerous developed

countries

so that they can rely on.

Besides

, so long as advanced

nations

do not

support

, poorer

countries

are unable to come out from crisis situations.

For example

, in the COVID-19 pandemic, Vietnam, a developing country whose medical facilities are not adequate to make a suitable vaccine in order to fight the plague.

This

nation has received vaccine provision from some affluent

countries

such

as the US or The UK for their Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine, which act as a precursor to dwindle remarkably the number of casualties from

this

pandemic.

Hence

, owing to an eclectic mix of upsides of worldwide intervention, it is of the essence for

nations

around the world ought to promote mutual assistance for mutual development. While the tremendous benefits of

countries

helping each other are widely acknowledged, some people still argue that it is not vital as the recipient

nations

may make use of it for the wrong purpose;

however

,

this

is completely ungrounded and unlikely. To be more specific, donor and sponsored

nations

will make joint commitments and the use of the subsidy will be controlled by both

countries

' authorities in order that the amount of

support

will be used for the right purpose and serve as enhancing the current urgent issues of the receivers. Indubitably, there is no rationale why the recipient country could misuse the money.

Thus

, it is monumentally imperative to step up worldwide intervention because the undeveloped and developing

nations

will not misspent cash

support

. To sum up, I strongly believe that global aid will be exceedingly advantageous and a great many

nations

had better assist others with a view to flourishing together.