The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do advantages of this will outweigh it's disadvantages

Since the beginning of the human species, the large bands of it's were organised by an authority or intellectual individuals . Nowadays

also

having an authorized community has been essential for each society,

besides

it is stated that the globe should have only jurisdiction for all

government

purposes.

This

essay is in a discussion of the merits and demerits of a given notion.

To begin

with benefits, the prominent advantage might be abolishing the diversity of the nations. As a consequence, the centralised ministry will be in the favour of only one fiat currency and it may be meritorious for economic purposes for citizens.

For example

, all European states are governed by a centralised force, the European Union, which gives priority to euro currency all over their states which uplift their economy and monetary value as well.

Moreover

, as there will be no separate country, so there will be no racism among people as well it will enforce apply global peace. That facts are enforcing to benefits of having a globally centralised

government

. Moving

further

to drawbacks, having a

government

all over the world is not possible.

Although

, there will be more political conflicts and civil wars for having governing power.

For instance

, Afghanistan has been more concerned by several governments of nations and news channels since it was captured and governed by terrorist groups a few months ago. So that kinds of activities might happen.

In addition

, the ruling

government

also

could be communal and can abolish peace and democracy in the world. As well

consequently

there would be several civil wars happens. those reasons are encouraged to drawbacks of only authority for the centralised globe. In conclusion, one global

government

is not possible to be established due to lots of reasons as well as facts bout it enforcing more to its drawbacks