It is argued that enhancing
equipment is very useful, but some
think it should evaluate other factors as well.
, there are rational arguments on both sides that remain a debatable issue, and
essay serves to give an insight into the situation, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, improving public
by growing the amount of
facilities is greatly beneficial.
, contact with nature might have a calming effect on the psyche, reducing stress,
is the main reason why outdoor exercise helps reduce stress better than indoors.
, it is necessary to have huge numbers of
facilities as free in most public places.
, by employing some available gym facilities in the railway station, most commuters can do exercises rather than just waste their time by waiting for the bus.
As a result
, the obesity rate of young
is increasing when they do not exercise and just sit around. The construction of the gyms area helps children realize the importance of
and thereby improve their activity level.
, under no circumstances is it not acceptable to have healthy
without doing sport.
On the other hand
activities might not be the only factor to determine as a clue of improving public
. Authorities have more responsibilities to enhance public
as well, other factors
as social behaviour, criminal activity and charity fund can play an essential role in measuring the healthy public.
, to increase public
, the government should launch a publicity campaign in the media and in schools to educate
about the importance of staying healthy.
can take the form of print advertisements and social media that tell
why they should steer clear of toxic lifestyles and engage in sporting activities. I believe that
sort of education is preferable because it encourages
to be more active.
In conclusion, both views are great in improving public energy. But I think that the combination of
and other measures can be more effective.