Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is argued that enhancing

sports

equipment is very useful, but some

people

think it should evaluate other factors as well.

However

, there are rational arguments on both sides that remain a debatable issue, and

this

essay serves to give an insight into the situation, followed by my opinion. On the one hand, improving public

health

by growing the amount of

sports

facilities is greatly beneficial.

Firstly

, contact with nature might have a calming effect on the psyche, reducing stress,

this

is the main reason why outdoor exercise helps reduce stress better than indoors.

Secondly

, it is necessary to have huge numbers of

sports

facilities as free in most public places.

For instance

, by employing some available gym facilities in the railway station, most commuters can do exercises rather than just waste their time by waiting for the bus.

As a result

, the obesity rate of young

people

is increasing when they do not exercise and just sit around. The construction of the gyms area helps children realize the importance of

health

and thereby improve their activity level.

Thus

, under no circumstances is it not acceptable to have healthy

people

without doing sport.

On the other hand

,

sports

activities might not be the only factor to determine as a clue of improving public

health

. Authorities have more responsibilities to enhance public

health

as well, other factors

such

as social behaviour, criminal activity and charity fund can play an essential role in measuring the healthy public.

Besides

, to increase public

health

, the government should launch a publicity campaign in the media and in schools to educate

people

about the importance of staying healthy.

This

can take the form of print advertisements and social media that tell

people

why they should steer clear of toxic lifestyles and engage in sporting activities. I believe that

this

sort of education is preferable because it encourages

people

to be more active. In conclusion, both views are great in improving public energy. But I think that the combination of

sports

and other measures can be more effective.