The detailed description about crime will affect people and cause many social problems. Some people say that the media should be strictly controlled.

There is a controversial notion heating a debate over the fact that whether to rigidly control detailed descriptions because of its social

issues

inducing and negative effect on

people

. Personally, I would consider myself a strong advocate of

this

school of thought due to underlying justifications. Without a shadow of a doubt, the thorough portrayal of

crime

can impact negatively on individuals and generate a slew of societal

issues

. To be more specific, a great many new outlets nowadays pay more attention to broadcast content related to

crime

scene reenactments, detailed descriptions of criminal acts and evident depiction of methods to commit crimes

such

as murdering or break-in. Indubitably, children and adolescents, who do not have the adequate right awareness and be curious about everything, may have a tendency to imitate the criminal actions blindly.

As a result

, they can become criminals in the not-so-distant future and contribute to the hike in the

crime

rate in society.

For instance

, "Unsolved Mysteries'' or "Dragnet" can be cited as compelling examples for programs focusing on the topic of

crime

as well as provide a huge amount of meticulous information about cases and criminal acts, which can unintentionally result in encouraging lawbreaking with

people

, especially the immature

such

as toddlers or teenagers.

Hence

, it is undeniable the influence of the detailed account on

people

's lives and it is regarded as one of the evident culprits ushering social problems. Irrefutably, the government should maintain strong control over the media but not ban it completely.

This

is because the thorough description of

crime

on new outlets can provide the viewers with a huge amount of useful information related to

this

topical question as well as act as a precursor to directly affect the awareness and actions of

people

. Certainly, by watching

crime

-reporting programs and updating detailed news about a lot of cases,

people

are able to find numerous appropriate and timely resolutions to all unwanted problems or unprecedented situations.

For instance

, seeing the full news with detailed depiction about

crime

such

as the information of a burglar or a

crime

scene,

people

will be more cautious and careful to prevent serious

issues

that can happen with them caused by criminals by taking some feasible actions

such

as applying noticeably placed surveillance cameras to potentially avoid possible break-ins.

Thus

, it is undeniable that a detailed account about

crime

still plays a paramount significant role in

people

' life which is the justification why it is of the essence to put means of media under strict control, not prohibit it totally. In conclusion, I believe that the comprehensive portrayal of

crime

will jeopardize

people

as well as trigger plenty of social

issues

and means of media ought to be tightly regulated without being banned utterly.