The advocates of international aid believe that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while the opponents consider it unnecessary because money is misspent by the governments that receive it.

There are some controversial ideas concerning the intervention of the wealthy countries to the ungrounded ones. While some claim that it is a moral responsibility to lend others a hand, the opposite makes a statement that supported money can be misused by the recipient. I would contend that the former may do more good than harm and the latter is invalid due to some underlying reasons. It is indisputable that global aid is of great necessity since it brings a wide variety of tremendous benefits. Due to the fact that some developing nations primarily lack the self-solving ability to some crucial problems ranging from education, economy to even transportation, especially healthcare.
Therefore
, they require the assistance of those healthy economic countries in order to rely on them.
Conversely
, if those affluent nations do not lend any financial support, the impoverished ones can not come out of
such
a crisis situation.
For instance
, in the Covid 19 pandemic, Vietnam, which is a developing country, does not have enough health facilities to produce a proper vaccine with a view to coping with
this
serious disease.
However
,
this
nation has received vaccine provision from the USA as well as the UK with Pfizer and AstraZeneca so that it could lessen considerably the casualty triggered by
this
pandemic. Since it could bring a wealth of redeeming features, it is necessary for the countries to foster the accomodating in order to eventually develop. While the aforementioned benefits are widely acknowledged, some people assume that
this
is unessential because those receivers may misuse those allowances.
Nevertheless
,
this
is completely pointless and hardly occurs.
In particular
, those nations will properly have a commitment and the spending of money will be supervised by both countries’ governments.
Hence
, there is no reason to perceive that the recipient can misspend the allowances. In conclusion, the tremendous benefits of supporting a poor nation from a wealthier one are undeniable.
Submitted by hominhtrang995 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: