Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages a higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over whether

guns

possession by the

police

would contribute to the increase in the rate of

violence

in that community. Personally, I consider myself an opponent of

this

idea. It is undisputed to note that allowing

police

forces to carry

guns

is not the underlying root leading to a higher

violence

percentage. Since most people are frightened of

guns

, the

police

can prevent potential criminals from committing crimes.

Hence

, having

such

weapons might help the

police

control criminal situations without resorting to physical

violence

.

For example

, a robber intending to break into a bank has a tendency to give up as he is scared of the presence of

police

officers who are entitled to own

guns

.

As a result

, firearms possession does not encourage the

violence

level but decreases it. It is understandable to claim that

police

officers should be armed with

guns

since these weapons help them to handle the situation more effectively. In

this

day and age, there is a wealth of serious crimes which act as an obstacle for

police

forces who are just equipped with basic weapons

such

as electric shock. In order to be able to tackle these conditions, the

police

should possess a gun

that is

not only useful in self-defence but

also

helps them to prevent the law-breakers from posing dangers to the community.

For example

, if terrorists threaten to kill people, policemen can shot them and save the hostages.

Therefore

, owning a gun does wonders for the community as it helps the

police

protect the public. In conclusion, carrying

guns

on duty does no harm to public security but helps

police

officers to make society safer.