In some countries students pay for them while in some others the government pays for them. Does the advantage that the government pays the money outweigh the disadvantage?

Investing money in edification, without being sceptical, is gaining ground. It is argued that in certain nations academic fees are paid by the pupils whereas in other countries the ministry pay fees on behalf of

students

. While

this

trend has certain demerits to some extent, I would argue it is merits are more significant , which will be explicated

further

. Commencing with pre-eminent positive aspects of

this

assertion. The former viable anatomy is, by having free teachings in the institutes, the poverty rate of underprivileged countries diminishes. To elaborate it more, if the immense number of

students

, irrespective of whether they are poor or rich, join colleges or university, it would enhance the career opportunities for them once they pass out from these colleges. Owing to

this

, they can not only support the financial needs of their family but

also

helps in making the community more developed. In the USA, to exemplify, the authority pay fee for the education which boosts the quality of the society as people are more educated.

Furthermore

, since more immigrants migrate to developed countries, it will generate huge revenue, which leads to enhance the economy of that

nation

;

Therefore

, investing money in education can ameliorate poverty, and inclined to the wealthy

nation

. In spite of having certain favourable aspects, the dark side of funding education by the legislature can not be overlooked. As there is no fee for joining the institute, more

students

will enrol in the colleges, which make the class overcrowded.

As a result

of

this

, teachers pay less attention to every student and the quality of knowledge regraded.

For instance

, in Vietnam, as the government bestow free enlightenment to the pupils and due to exceeding the limit of classes, at present 80% of

students

fail to comprehend the subject in a better way. In conclusion, albeit by imparting funded edification the value of it begin to diminish, the make a

nation

wealthy by introducing more immigrants in it plus poverty rate

also

reduced to a large extent which will more fruitful for the growth of a

nation

.