Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. Agree or disagree?

There are arguments a

risen

Wrong verb form

arising

show examples

about the idea governments should fully sponsor the tuition fee to make sure everyone could attend

university

. While

this

could offer benefits, I strongly disagree with

this

act for two reasons. On the one hand, it is true that the abolition of college fees could benefit both students and society. Admittedly, as more people are freely admitted to the

university

, the number of bachelor degree holders could increase, which equals the rise in the quantity of a more educated workforce. With these qualifications, they could secure well-paid jobs, which not only benefits t

hemselves

Correct pronoun usage

them

show examples

but

also

make contributions to their country's economic development.

However

,

this

argument is flawed, since there are many jobs that do not require a higher

education

degree to make money.

For example

, to do a job as a hairdresser, one just needs to take vocational training courses

instead

of spending four years or more attending

university

.

Thus

, subsiding

university

tuition to everyone is unnecessary.

On the other hand

, I side with those who are against allotting state funding for two reasons.

Firstly

, free tuition could negatively influence students’ academic performance. Since being exempt from

this

financial obligation, which normally makes them take studying seriously, students could be indifferent to their study and lose the drive to work hard.

For example

, they may skip classes or miss exams because they feel that failing does not cost them anything. These b

ehaviors

Change the spelling

behaviours

show examples

obviously may lead to deteriorating performance and students would fail to benefit from their

education

.

Besides

, not all country has the financial ability to subside the

university

education

fee. Take some less-developed countries in African

such

as Angola

for example

. Apart from higher

education

, there are other sectors requiring the government's help while the national budget is limited.

Therefore

, the government has to consider funding sectors that need more urgent help.

For instance

, in the current situation when the COVID pandemic has been widespread and costs millions of lives, these countries obviously should put more financial emphasis on healthcare.

Thus

, providing free higher

education

sounds impractical. In conclusion, even though freeing

university

education

could provide a higher qualification workforce, I support the idea that government should not do

this

due to the negative impact

this

act causes on students’ studying attitude and its impracticality in the current situation.