Some people think young people should be required to have full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The duration of full-time education that one should adopt has been a debated issue. While some people suggest that one should not end their full-time studying until adolescence age, I totally disagree with

this

idea.

Firstly

, finance should be taken into consideration when one’s time is fully devoted to studying. For those whose family struggles with financial issues, a full-time study would be a huge burden. Though financial funds may be offered, they are not likely to fully cover the costs.

Instead

of spending all day at an educational institution, teenagers could financially support their family b

y

Change preposition

with

show examples

money earned from different sources

such

as working in a factory.

Hence

, full-time education for their whole teenage period may not be ideal for underprivileged families.

Secondly

, each individual should be entitled to pursue their own paths other than the masses of studying. The idea that studying all day at

school

will offer a better future has been becoming rampant on various media platforms.

This

may be true to some extent, but not for all teenagers. For those who are not destined for studying and researching, it must be mentally painful to sit all day a

Change preposition

on at

show examples

t

Correct your spelling

a

show examples

college bench.

In addition

, dropping out of

school

does not mean a future scenario. Richard Branson is a case in point. After leaving high

school

at the age of 16, he started his own business and became one of the most successful entrepreneurs in the world.

This

is a testament to pursuing one’s own value. In conclusion, I totally disagree with the idea that all teenagers should finish their high

school

education and the duration of full-time should be considered in tandem with their financial condition and willingness.