Some people think that governments should spend public money on saving minority languages. Others, however, believe that would be a waste of public money. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The financial questions raised by whether
governments
funding should be given to
minority
languages
or not are subject to much debate. As far as equity and
efficiency
are concerned, I personally believe that it is not a good choice to spend too much on saving
minority
languages
.
First
and foremost,
governments
only have limited funds that need to support diverse fields and saving
minority
languages
would involve high costs inevitably. Obviously, there are more important areas that
governments
need to be concerned preferential,
such
as education, health care, public transport and so forth, which go hand in hand with everyone. If
governments
give priority to saving
minority
languages
, the investment capital in other fields would decrease dramatically, which would damage the interests of citizens who do not use these
minority
languages
.
In addition
to equity,
efficiency
should
also
be taken into consideration. Speaking the same language could help to boost the
efficiency
of communication, and it is beneficial for cross-regional cooperation and business. In these cases, language would not be a hinder between different areas. Admittedly, cultural diversity could enrich our lives and make our cities more interesting to some extent.
For instance
, my school usually holds some creative activities about diverse
languages
to board our sight of various cultures. Simultaneously, language is more than a means of communication, but an important part of the cultural heritage of the people who speak it. The disappearance of
minority
languages
would erode these people’s cultural identity. In conclusion, the negative impacts that stem from supporting
minority
languages
could provoke knock-on consequences of equity and
efficiency
,
although
it is beneficial for cultural diversity.
Submitted by yang-luo19 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: