The advocates of international aid believe that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while the opponents consider it unnecessary, because money is misspent by the governments that receive it.

In
this
day and age, international aid has never failed to provoke controversial debates among people. While some claim that
countries
need to support others, others believe that worldwide assistance should not be taken into a keen focus due to the misspending of the receiver. While the latter is valid to some certain extent, I would contend that global intervention is still put priority on. Without a shadow of a doubt, the government should invest money in other
countries
because of its tremendous benefits. Since some unhealthy economic
countries
don’t have the financial ability to tackle their dire problems on their own, they need sponsorship from wealthy nations to lean on. If affluent nations don’t lend them a hand when they are in a critical condition, these
countries
can not get out of a crisis situation. Vietnam, the developing country whose medical system is too dilapidated and has inadequate vaccine resources in the Covid19 can be cited as a solid instance. America and Britain have provided a frenzy of vaccines
such
as Pfizer and AstraZeneca for Vietnam so that our nation can diminish the death toll to fight against the pandemic. Due to these underlying merits, it is undeniable that a global intervention promotes the impoverishment of the whole community.
Although
the redeeming features of the international coffer are widely acknowledged, it is believed that these funds can be optimized for personal purposes.
This
statement is ungrounded and hard to emerge because the sender has to conduct a detailed plan for what to use before giving the receiver that fund. Two governments negotiate and make commitments for projects carried out by international aid with a view to reaching the right purpose of amending the impoverished
countries
. With strict control, the worldwide fund will be made best for its suitable goal to bring a better standard of these
countries
. In conclusion, it is undisputed that the government should help others with careful and proper management so that international aid can serve as its key meaning to flourish simultaneously the distinct nations in the world.
Submitted by hominhtrang995 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: