Some people believe is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion

In an era of technology more and more information is spreading on the internet, beginning with exploring works and ending with scholarships of universities. Some think that it is good to stake knowledge with the world as much as possible, while there are others who believe that knowledge is too essential or too precious to be messaged unreservedly. Personally, my view is that intelligence in free usage is too dear to share society.

This

essay will describe both views and provide them with examples. On the one hand, sharing of intelligence helps to solve global problems,

for example

, Covid-19. If researchers would not invent vaccines the world may lose many nations, the pandemic would end soon,

therefore

, families would lose a lot of close ones. One factor that would worry everyone - is the nonproliferation of scientists. If that would be, the world would never see new innovations, which help in the progress of humanity.

On the other hand

, sharing some material can cause big problems.

For instance

, If on the internet would post secret data like drafts of nuclear bombs, some crucial humans might use them for destroying all humanity.

Also

,

for example

, if some companies would invent new technology, other unfair companies could create a similar product to compete with them, and innovational companies like said before could never create new technologies because of stealing information. In conclusion, the public should, in my opinion, announce important knowledge but not share them if it is secret or self-important. Sharing intelligence helps humanity to solve and avoid problems,

however

, people have to not forget that sharing valuable information may cause the breakdown of new technologies and innovations.