In order to reduce the likelihood of 
 , announcing a rise in the legal 
 of drivers and riders is considered to be the most effective measure by a few individuals. In my perspective, 
, 
 would not guarantee one hundred 
percentChange the spelling
show examples
  on-
 safety, 
, other actions corporating implementation of 
 control policies along with 
provisionAdd an article
show examples
  of adequate 
 prerequisite to lessen the number of 
 .
Certainly, the fact cannot be denied that mature drivers are lesser prone to encounter collisions than immature ones. The rationale behind 
 could be the experience that they have had which acts as a defender in the situation when either minor or major unfortunate events are about to occur. An exemplification of 
 could be the cases when any stray animal  suddenly comes in front of the vehicle; at that time a skilled, competent driver might handle the situation more efficiently and effectively as compared to the novice. 
, it appears that if 
ageAdd an article
show examples
  for getting 
drivingAdd an article
show examples
  licence is risen up from 18 to at least 22, there might be 
minimumAdd an article
show examples
  prospect of mishaps 
 on the 
. 
, 
 cannot be an all-time scenario.
In certain circumstances, it is witnessed that the prime factors contributing 
roadChange preposition
show examples
   are not always the immaturity of driver or rider, but the poor 
 condition coupled with 
 congestion. 
, mere an increase in 
legalCorrect article usage
show examples
   of driving cannot completely assure safety on 
, rather 
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
  had better improve the condition of 
 so that neither the person who is driving nor the common citizen who is crossing the path has to experience any unforeseen incident. 
, stringent policies are required to be imposed to limit the bottleneck on roadways. 
, 
highCorrect article usage
show examples
  amount of 
fineFix the agreement mistake
show examples
  must be charged from the people, not abiding by the 
 regulations for mitigating the root cause of many 
. 
 would deter the individuals to violate any rule, as it is human instinct that the higher one has to pay, the more responsible one behaves. In short, on-
 disasters cannot be controlled until and unless 
 types of initiatives are appraised.
To conclude, it can be asserted that 
 the probability of security on 
 can be encouraged by legally increasing the 
 of driving, to ensure an altogether safety, 
originAdd an article
show examples
  of the issue needs to be terminated for which suitable 
 regulating system and bump-free 
 are 
mustAdd an article
show examples
 . 
, I would say that an amalgamation of these measures is the best approach to follow.