In order to reduce the likelihood of
, announcing a rise in the legal
of drivers and riders is considered to be the most effective measure by a few individuals. In my perspective,
,
would not guarantee one hundred
percentChange the spelling
show examples
on-
safety,
, other actions corporating implementation of
control policies along with
provisionAdd an article
show examples
of adequate
prerequisite to lessen the number of
.
Certainly, the fact cannot be denied that mature drivers are lesser prone to encounter collisions than immature ones. The rationale behind
could be the experience that they have had which acts as a defender in the situation when either minor or major unfortunate events are about to occur. An exemplification of
could be the cases when any stray animal suddenly comes in front of the vehicle; at that time a skilled, competent driver might handle the situation more efficiently and effectively as compared to the novice.
, it appears that if
ageAdd an article
show examples
for getting
drivingAdd an article
show examples
licence is risen up from 18 to at least 22, there might be
minimumAdd an article
show examples
prospect of mishaps
on the
.
,
cannot be an all-time scenario.
In certain circumstances, it is witnessed that the prime factors contributing
roadChange preposition
show examples
are not always the immaturity of driver or rider, but the poor
condition coupled with
congestion.
, mere an increase in
legalCorrect article usage
show examples
of driving cannot completely assure safety on
, rather
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
had better improve the condition of
so that neither the person who is driving nor the common citizen who is crossing the path has to experience any unforeseen incident.
, stringent policies are required to be imposed to limit the bottleneck on roadways.
,
highCorrect article usage
show examples
amount of
fineFix the agreement mistake
show examples
must be charged from the people, not abiding by the
regulations for mitigating the root cause of many
.
would deter the individuals to violate any rule, as it is human instinct that the higher one has to pay, the more responsible one behaves. In short, on-
disasters cannot be controlled until and unless
types of initiatives are appraised.
To conclude, it can be asserted that
the probability of security on
can be encouraged by legally increasing the
of driving, to ensure an altogether safety,
originAdd an article
show examples
of the issue needs to be terminated for which suitable
regulating system and bump-free
are
mustAdd an article
show examples
.
, I would say that an amalgamation of these measures is the best approach to follow.