Some people believe that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree

In order to reduce the likelihood of

road

accidents

, announcing a rise in the legal

age

of drivers and riders is considered to be the most effective measure by a few individuals. In my perspective,

however

,

this

would not guarantee one hundred

percent

Change the spelling

per cent

show examples

on-

road

safety,

therefore

, other actions corporating implementation of

traffic

control policies along with

provision

Add an article

the provision

show examples

of adequate

roads

prerequisite to lessen the number of

road

accidents

. Certainly, the fact cannot be denied that mature drivers are lesser prone to encounter collisions than immature ones. The rationale behind

this

could be the experience that they have had which acts as a defender in the situation when either minor or major unfortunate events are about to occur. An exemplification of

this

could be the cases when any stray animal suddenly comes in front of the vehicle; at that time a skilled, competent driver might handle the situation more efficiently and effectively as compared to the novice.

Thus

, it appears that if

age

Add an article

the age

show examples

for getting

driving

Add an article

a driving

show examples

licence is risen up from 18 to at least 22, there might be

minimum

Add an article

the minimum

a minimum

show examples

prospect of mishaps

occuring

Correct your spelling

occurring

on the

roads

.

However

,

this

cannot be an all-time scenario. In certain circumstances, it is witnessed that the prime factors contributing

road

Change preposition

to road

show examples

accidents

are not always the immaturity of driver or rider, but the poor

road

condition coupled with

traffic

congestion.

Therefore

, mere an increase in

legal

Correct article usage

the legal

show examples

age

of driving cannot completely assure safety on

roads

, rather

government

Correct article usage

the government

show examples

had better improve the condition of

roads

so that neither the person who is driving nor the common citizen who is crossing the path has to experience any unforeseen incident.

Additionally

, stringent policies are required to be imposed to limit the bottleneck on roadways.

For instance

,

high

Correct article usage

a high

show examples

amount of

fine

Fix the agreement mistake

fines

show examples

must be charged from the people, not abiding by the

traffic

regulations for mitigating the root cause of many

accidents

.

This

would deter the individuals to violate any rule, as it is human instinct that the higher one has to pay, the more responsible one behaves. In short, on-

road

disasters cannot be controlled until and unless

such

types of initiatives are appraised. To conclude, it can be asserted that

although

the probability of security on

roads

can be encouraged by legally increasing the

age

of driving, to ensure an altogether safety,

origin

Add an article

the origin

show examples

of the issue needs to be terminated for which suitable

traffic

regulating system and bump-free

roads

are

must

Add an article

a must

show examples

.

Hence

, I would say that an amalgamation of these measures is the best approach to follow.