Some people think that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

A group of individuals believe that country’s officials have to shed light on minimizing the toxicity of the environment and households and cure citizens from getting sick. I strongly believe that government officials must put their energy into tackling the toxicity on the air and households need because of two reasons which are locally and internationally. The main reason why I believe that government have to solve the problem of toxicity in the air and their voter’s housing is that they have a local duty toward citizen which means that they are obliged to fdsa these needs.

Furthermore

Linking Words

,

countries

Use synonyms

should have gone after citizen needs and one of the fundamental needs fds to live in an area where the air is clean and to have a place to sleep. Despite the fact, that government’s officials are citizens at the end. Another reason why I think that

countries

Use synonyms

need to solve any problem related to the environment and household so because they have an international duty toward their citizens. Obviously, most of the

countries

Use synonyms

are in the United Nations and to be member

countries

Use synonyms

have to agree to the United Nation’s rule. In fact, most of the rules are talking about what are human needs

such

Linking Words

– housing, justice, safety, and health -;

therefore

Linking Words

, all

countries

Use synonyms

must offer these needs to their citizen. In conclusion, I completely admit that governments must solve any problem related to the environment and household; apparently,

this

Linking Words

is because they have local and international obligations. I highly recommend

countries

Use synonyms

to take care of their citizen’s welfare.