Some people think that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

A group of individuals believe that country’s officials have to shed light on minimizing the toxicity of the environment and households and cure citizens from getting sick. I strongly believe that government officials must put their energy into tackling the toxicity on the air and households need because of two reasons which are locally and internationally. The main reason why I believe that government have to solve the problem of toxicity in the air and their voter’s housing is that they have a local duty toward citizen which means that they are obliged to fdsa these needs.
Furthermore
,
countries
should have gone after citizen needs and one of the fundamental needs fds to live in an area where the air is clean and to have a place to sleep. Despite the fact, that government’s officials are citizens at the end. Another reason why I think that
countries
need to solve any problem related to the environment and household so because they have an international duty toward their citizens. Obviously, most of the
countries
are in the United Nations and to be member
countries
have to agree to the United Nation’s rule. In fact, most of the rules are talking about what are human needs
such
– housing, justice, safety, and health -;
therefore
, all
countries
must offer these needs to their citizen. In conclusion, I completely admit that governments must solve any problem related to the environment and household; apparently,
this
is because they have local and international obligations. I highly recommend
countries
to take care of their citizen’s welfare.
Submitted by Serhii Baraniuk on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • respiratory diseases
  • heart conditions
  • incidence
  • affordable housing
  • stress
  • infectious diseases
  • preventative measures
  • cost-effective
  • healthcare infrastructure
  • comprehensive approach
  • global warming
  • climate change
  • exacerbated
What to do next:
Look at other essays: