The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial notion heating a debate over the funding of the

government

budget. A school of thought claims that

government

should finance medical

research

to protect

citizen’

Fix the agreement mistake

citizens’

show examples

health

instead

of funding for protecting the environment.

Although

this

idea is valid to some certain extent, I do not totally agree with

this

. It is undisputed that

government

should use their coffer to fund for medical

research

to protect residents’

health

because of several reasonable reasons. Obviously, there are many strange pandemics posing a strong threat to human

health

currently, which may not have a suitable therapy to cure.

For example

, the Covid-19 virus, which exacerbates directly to human’s lungs, has killed a million people all around the world in recent 2 years.

However

,

this

disease has not had the specific medicine to treat.

Therefore

, the

government

has to raise funds for scientists to

research

more novel medicine to protect human’s

health

.

Nevertheless

, environmental protection

also

needs

government

funding due to some relevant reasons. Evidently, there

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

an eclectic mix of environmental issues which deteriorate the environmental quality. For instants, a few years ago, the Formosa company in Ha Tinh, Viet Nam discharged their untreated wastewater straightly to the ocean’s surface, which wreak strong havoc on marine creatures.

Thus

, the

government

should use their budget to fund dealing with these dire problems. To sum up, the

government

should spend their coffer to fund both medical

research

and environmental protection.

However

, they have to balance these things to avoid a deficit in their budget.