With the increase in low-cost airlines, overseas travel has never been easier or more affordable. However, some people believe that such travel should be limited or stopped altogether to preserve the planet. How far do you agree with this viewpoint? Should governments put measures in place to control the amount of air travel?

In
this
modern era, due to the increase in the number of cost-efficient
airlines
, many people choose it as their
travel
preference because of its affordability .
On the other hand
, some people think that to decrease aviation
pollution
the
air
travel
ought to be limited or banned completely. In my opinion, I disagree with
this
statement as it would affect the economy of a country, so governments can take a few measures to limit
air
travel
to reduce the
pollution
by aviation.
To begin
with, banning
air
travel
may affect the financial status of a country. In contemporary times, numerous goods are exported through
airlines
at
a cheaper prices
Correct the article-noun agreement
a cheaper price
cheaper prices
show examples
due to the affordable
air
ticket rates.
This
enhances the country’s
trade
which would eventually boost that country’s economy. Prohibition of
air
travel
not only affects the
trade
but
also
may affect the country’s
tourism
because without airways it is difficult to reach some nations like Australia and The USA. It is a well-known fact among educators is that
tourism
aids a nation with a good amount of
money
. If
air
travel
is forbidden, the countries earning from
tourism
as well as
trade
would be decreased.
Therefore
,
air
travel
should not be demolished which would significantly reduce the major incomes of a nation.
Instead
of banning
air
travel
, governments can introduce some schemes to limit
air
travel
without affecting
tourism
and
trade
. Nowadays, most people are travelling through
airlines
for domestic purposes.
This
travel
can be minimized by spending
money
to improve railways and roadways.
In addition
, authorities can spend
money
on research to invent eco-friendly fuel which might reduce
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
aviation
pollution
in spite of increased
air
travel
.
Thus
, allocating
money
to other transports and introducing bio-friendly fuel would reduce
air
pollution
. In conclusion, despite banning
airlines
, governments could decrease
air
pollution
by inventing eco-friendly fuel and allocating funds to enhance roadways as well as railways.
Submitted by dr.prem132 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: