Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is often argued that the introduction of global matches is more beneficial for the nation, while others believe that these

games

have negative impacts. In my opinion, I believe that

although

the local

games

have harmful effects, overall they benefit the foreign

sports

event hosting to the nation. A growing body of research suggests that presenting universal matches have a generally positive effect on the nation. One key benefit is that the hosting of international tournaments can help to learn all the

games

in the world.

This

can lead to participation in other gaming activities.

For example

, the community that should participate in the Olympics, they have to know all matches in the world. For these reasons, the introduction of worldwide

sports

is the best way for nations.

However

, there are

also

negative impacts that must be considered. One important issue is that a universal

sports

event can reduce the interest in a local meet.

This

means that some local meets are likely to close down.

For instance

, the local people in the country not paying more attention to their national meet

instead

of other

games

.

Moreover

, the local events in most of the country are destroyed due to international matches presentations. In conclusion, while international

sports

can benefit to link other countries through learning all events, they

also

destroy the local tournaments. In my opinion, despite having some negative effects, I believe that hosting global events is generally beneficial.