In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

As obesity has been a wide problem mainly in the most developed countries, some governments are considering improving the

taxes

Use synonyms

applied on junk

food

Use synonyms

, in

order

Use synonyms

to make

people

Use synonyms

avoid its consumption. Personally, I strongly disagree with that statement, since

this

Linking Words

is not going to be a solution for

this

Linking Words

matter. At

first

Linking Words

, it is important to consider that individuals must be able to choose whatever they want to consume, even if their choice is not the best for their health. Living in a democratic place means, overall, giving

people

Use synonyms

equal rights to do anything they want, as much as it does not interfere with other's

people

Use synonyms

choices.

This

Linking Words

Government suggestion would correspond to stopping selling meats in the boucheries, in

order

Use synonyms

to impose

people

Use synonyms

to turn vegetarians and,

consequently

Linking Words

, help the reduction of methane in the air and, as well, decrease pollutions rate to the world, in a global perspective, while in another hand would contribute to

people

Use synonyms

's health as an individual instance, which is a completely insane idea.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, whereas for some perspectives processed

food

Use synonyms

might be a non-satisfactory choice for some individuals, it would mean to be the only resource for others. It is explained because junk

food

Use synonyms

as mac and cheese,

for example

Linking Words

, usually is way cheaper than buying proteins, like rice and beans, from the marketplace. From

this

Linking Words

point of view, increasing

taxes

Use synonyms

on those unhealthy items would only become a bigger problem for

society

Use synonyms

, since probably there would be more starving

people

Use synonyms

on the streets, without anything to eat in

order

Use synonyms

to survive, which

also

Linking Words

could increase homeless and violence rates. So on, indeed, it still would not be a solution for the obesity problem. It must be considered that the rush on somebody's routine, summed at the way those GMO

food

Use synonyms

save

people

Use synonyms

's time, mainly on business weekdays and its delightful flavour, will do contribute to

this

Linking Words

kind of majority consumption.

Therefore

Linking Words

,

instead

Linking Words

of taking off the possibility of acquiring these kinds of products, it would be more effective, as a Government Policy, to buzz up lectures and advertising, in

order

Use synonyms

to teach

people

Use synonyms

how to get organized and conscious about what they digest and how high calories in those foods could be resulting, in the near future, in hearth diseases and be a bad choice for their health, as sides effects of its consumption. In summary, as already exposed above, increasing

taxes

Use synonyms

will definitely not contribute to making

people

Use synonyms

avoid junk

food

Use synonyms

, as it will not be a resourceful way of reducing obesity

taxes

Use synonyms

in

society

Use synonyms

.

This

Linking Words

idea would only bring more issues to the

society

Use synonyms

and its Government, but would

also

Linking Words

not be solving the real

society

Use synonyms

's obese situation.