· Task 2 : Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages a higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Nowadays, armed police

forces

are playing a significantly vital role in keeping the safety of communities. Yet, there remains a controversial debate as to whether their allowance for carrying warm weapons can be an influential factor in reducing the rate of violation or is a motivation for higher crime.

This

essay will discuss the proposed topic from both sides of view with some detailed explanations.

Firstly

, without ,

guns

it is not possible to defend inhabitants from the dangers of criminals.

This

is an indisputable fact that most of the offenders carry

guns

, which presents the significance of having firearms for the police.

Furthermore

, if the culprits are aware of the fact that these safe holders own warm weapons, they will be cautious about their actions;

thus

, the level of breaking law will be limited and reduced to a minimal level

that is

an influential criterion in raising the living standards in a region.

Consequently

, it can be clearly justified that the policemen are not strong enough against the offenders without

guns

since they can be victims themselves.

On the other hand

, the crowd may be motivated to buy

guns

for themselves to ensure their safety. A policeman with a gun can transfer the concept of a need for

guns

to the community living in the area resulting in a significant rise of violations in the zone.

For instance

, by observing the armed

forces

in a region, the settlers can be encouraged to purchase armoires as an effective tool to protect their loved ones; meanwhile, the lack of knowledge about these perilous elements can play a reversible outcome for the population since it can increase the threat for the families in their accommodation, particularly for the younger generation.

Additionally

, it can be an excruciatingly negative parameter to enhance the policemen with

guns

based on their destructive influences on the public to provide armoires. As a way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that armed

forces

can both prevent the vicious and increase the aggression in the zone;

however

, I strongly believe the role as barristers with the help of armoires can be more sacrifying.

In addition

, it is highly recommended to educate the nation about the necessity of holding warm weapons for the police

forces

as long as avoiding them from buying

guns

for themselves.