Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money. What is your opinion?

There is no gain-saying that the society is polarized into two groups whether the
money
should be spent on
species
which are in a danger or not?
Although
the protection of
animals
is necessary to balance an eco-cycle, some countries can not afford these expenses due to low economies. In my opinion, I believe that to save biodiversity,
species
need to be saved. Undoubtedly, there is not merely
one
but a basketful of causative reasons why endangered
species
need protection, out of which, the most prominent
one
is that each plays a vital role in the environmental cycle. To put it
in other words
, depletion of
one
can impact various lives by which calamities can occur.
For instance
, In forest Carnivores depends on herbivores for their survival. If herbivores get depleted
then
carnivores can attack humans for their food.
Hence
, the extinction of
one
species
can impact detrimentally on the lives of others which can imbalance the whole biodiversity. Having said that when it comes to the opponents
then
the countries who are not capable to provide basic things
such
as shelter, education and food to their people, consider spending
money
on
animals
as wastage. The nations, that come under the poverty line are not developed and lack basic amenities for their people by which they can not afford expenses of
animals
and their protection. To substantiate it, India is a perfect epitome here where the government do not have a lot of budget for wildlife.
Therefore
, they use their
money
to upgrade the lifestyle of human beings and education rather than saving wild
animals
. To conclude, there would be no exaggeration to state that both viewpoints have their own ramifications. Even though the extinction of
species
need
Change the verb form
needs
show examples
to be stopped to conserve the environment;
however
some regions do not have sufficient
money
to be spent on the preservation of some lives.
Consequently
, I reckon that the elimination of certain
animals
may cause destruction in the food chain.
Submitted by sanmaster2752 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: