It is often said that governments spend too much money on project to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Many countries allocate large budgets to preserving wild nature,

although

there are some people who disagree because if some more important issues which need to be addressed , I strongly believe that

this

protection is necessary and I will explain more details in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, the protection of flora and fauna by authorities is important due to the crucial role of every single part of it in the ecosystem. Without balanced and healthy living nature there will be several consequences for humankind, and to maintain a healthy ecological balance on the earth, all living creatures should be protected.

For example

, If a single species would become extinct, the whole food chain is disrupted and it can affect humans on the top of

this

chain.

On the other hand

,

although

there are several problems that need to be addressed by the administrations, protecting wild nature is necessary to solve a lot of men made problems. The major factor that can repair the human effect on the planet is

wildlife

. Humankind activities have led to some phenomena

such

as climate change and  global warming, and the only major factor which can negate the consequences is

wildlife

.

For instance

, the huge amount of emitted carbon dioxide never would be disappeared unless photosynthesis in the forest.

Hence

we have to protect

wildlife

first

  for ourselves,

second

, for negating our impact on the planet. In conclusion,

although

there are some who believe spending a huge amount of money to protect

wildlife

is unnecessary, and it is better to spend

this

money on other issues. Due to some important reasons, I think

this

protection is important and should be continued.