It is often said that governments spend too much money on project to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

It is considered that governments provide significant financial resources on saving the wild animal lives whereas enormous the most valuable issues left without attention. In my opinion, I agree that social or economic problems are more urgent and should be solved

first

Linking Words

.

However

Linking Words

, the natural creatures help to stay on the Earth unique and nutritious. Personally, I think that in our country numerous individuals who live without home or people who suffer from hard diseases.

For example

Linking Words

, when there is no materialistic support from the side of the government, it becomes hard to handle the situation on their own. Does it mean that the animal`s life is far more important than the people`s?

Moreover

Linking Words

, according to my mind, rather than spending money

for

Change preposition

on

show examples

wildlife, it would be better to work out homelessness and poor health questions.

Nonetheless

Linking Words

,

on the other hand

Linking Words

, I partially disagree because every creation of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

space has its own mission.

For instance

Linking Words

, If there had been vanished insects, there would have been distracted one process on the Earth.

Consequently

Linking Words

, it affects the proper functioning of the

next

Linking Words

features. After all, if the government had not been financing our wildlife

then

Linking Words

nobody would have done it. To conclude, proper attention for both nature and society should be taken into consideration. But, mostly individual`s state should be questioned, as the major that comprises

this

Linking Words

world is the people. On the whole, if

a

Correct article usage

the

show examples

condition of the community is

in

Change preposition

at

show examples

an excellent level,

then

Linking Words

there would not be a reasonable dispute on the theme of nature from the side of inhabitants.