There are debatable views about whether it is better to have standard punishments for each type of
crime
or to consider more about other factors or circumstances before
crimeAdd an article
show examples
. In my opinion, both have numerous advantages and drawbacks,
however
, I strongly believe that judgment after considerations about reasons behind
this
is a wiser choice and I will support my view elaborately in
this
essay.
On one hand, there is a group of individuals who support the idea of imposing fixed retributions because of various reasons.
First
of all, one of the most
benefits of fixed punishments is
itCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
saveChange the verb form
show examples
a lot of time for the trial.
In other words
, standardized laws make court
proceedingFix the agreement mistake
show examples
faster and more efficient since the judges do not have to waste time considering
further
factors.
Moreover
, these type of
is the possible way to save money not only for the government but
also
for the victim’s families. Since offenders will be released after receiving retributions, the government can save money for other expenditures of the country and the victim’s family use less of their budgets to hire lawyers or for transportation.
However
, these rules
sometimesAdd a missing verb
show examples
too primitive to be applied in
this
modern world nowadays.
For instance
, many people who kill someone because of self-defence do not deserve to be
into the same category as other killers.
On the other hand
, it is believed that every
crime
should be considered
before making
decisionAdd an article
show examples
because of its positive impacts.
To begin
, flexible
are thought to be more equal, compassionate and humane. The judge has to weigh in the gravity of the
crime
such
as motivation, plan,… of the criminals to come up with suitable punishment which
ensureChange the verb form
show examples
the fair trial for
circumstance.
Additionally
, there are more and more crimes
happenedCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
without any intence or criminals were forced to do it to protect themselves are their families,
hence
, it is necessary to judge crimes differently
instead
of applying the same punishment.
Nevertheless
,
these kindChange the determiner
show examples
of laws can easily prone to bribery and corruption since rich offenders can hire good lawyers, can pay the judges or investigators for
shorterAdd an article
show examples
periodFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of jail or lighter retributions.
In conclusion, there are
sillCorrect your spelling
show examples
different arguments about which punishments are better to be applied
both have positive and negative influences. In my point of view, I still firmly agree that
justiceCorrect article usage
show examples
system must consider and follow the different
procedureFix the agreement mistake
show examples
for each case before giving punishment.