It is often argued that the increase in the price of carbon fuel is the best method if we want to decrease the severity of air pollution in cities.
On the one hand,
cars
indeed elicit a great amount of greenhouse and other toxic fumes into the atmosphere. Use synonyms
Consequently
, creating incentives for Linking Words
people
to start using personal vehicles less and to choose other means of transportation would benefit the environment. Use synonyms
This
measure would Linking Words
also
support technological advancements as corporations would invest in Linking Words
cars
that require less fuel to operate.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, if you increase the price of petrol you cause the rise of prices for all goods that are transported by lorries including food. Linking Words
This
would create an extra burden for the most vulnerable members of the society Linking Words
such
as the elderly, families with many kids and Linking Words
people
with disabilities. Use synonyms
Furthermore
, when the government concentrates its attention on fuel and vehicles it misses other important issues. Linking Words
For instance
, why do Linking Words
people
need to drive Use synonyms
cars
Use synonyms
.
Perhaps, the quality of the public transport is so poor that Change the punctuation
?
people
do not have any other choice rather than to go by car. In Use synonyms
this
case, it would be beneficial to develop other types of public transport.
In conclusion, while managing air pollution by increasing petrol prices is a fair solution, I believe that it has its disadvantages. In order to decrease the number of Linking Words
cars
in the cities, governments should look for other strategies that would not harm poorer citizens.Use synonyms
foklacu