In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule?

Smoking is injurious to

health

. There are a number of countries where smoking is commonly used

places

is prohibited,

such

as cinemas, offices, and other publicly used locations. I believe it's a great law that can prevent indirect smoking and make

places

more livable and productive. I have explained my points of view in

further

paragraphs. To commence with, it's scientifically proved that passive smoking is the same destructive for the

health

as active smoking. Cigarette smoke can cause many critical

health

conditions

such

as cancer, heart fatigue and high blood pressure.

In addition

to that, it

also

reduces immune system strength which

also

invites other viral infections in the human body. Any country can't be developed well if it has more unhealthy people reside in.

For example

, in developing countries like Pakistan,

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

smoking habit is a really big problem over there, which causes many

health

issues among the population which mitigate its economical growth.

Secondly

, passive smoking makes offices less productive which affects business and the overall work environment,

For instance

, there are different kinds of people who come office to work, many have various problems and allergies to smoke, if smoking is allowed in the workplace, all employees except smoker can face different

health

issues at the office which badly affect business growth. I totally support that smoking in public

places

is not advantageous for nations and offices, so

this

law should be kept like

this

and the government should try to apply

this

law to other public

places

such

as public washrooms, swimming pools, parties and social gatherings.