Schools should prepare students for the labour market and not waste tme and resources on theoretcal knowledge. Do you agree or disagree?

Today’s work environment has become increasingly specialized.
Accordingly
, many parents want schools to focus their limited resources on furnishing children with
skills
that are relevant to the workplace rather than on abstract ideas. I strongly disagree with
this
notion due to its long-term consequences, both for the individual and for
society
. In terms of individuals, graduates with narrow scopes of training become married to their
skills
.
This
means they are limited to what they have learned and become highly dependent on the health of their particular industry. Take
for example
an expert in petroleum extraction who lost his job when the oil market collapsed. His
skills
are so specialized that he cannot simply move on to another field;
thus
, he would need to return to school to gain new, employable
skills
, or wait for the oil market to rebound. Had
this
person been given a theoretical knowledge base, he may have been more well-rounded and adaptable to changes in his industry. As regards
society
, if we create a world of limited individuals, entire communities may lose their diversity and innovation as its members cannot think beyond their schooling. Without theoretical knowledge, critical thinking
skills
are lost, soon followed by a loss of cultural identity, tolerance for others, and the ability to expand horizons. A
society
of scientists and accountants,
in other words
, will not be able to provide people with the spiritual, emotional, and creative stimuli they need to get through life and grow, leading in the long run to stagnant and failed societies. In conclusion, there
is
Change the verb form
are
show examples
no doubt children should be equipped with
skills
that will make them employable;
however
, as children evolve into the adults that comprise
a
Remove the article
apply
show examples
society
, they need to be prepared to deal with life outside the office.
Submitted by jithinvarghesejose on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: