Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

During the whole period of human's history, art was one of the most unjustified spheres. A wide range of

artists

struggles with low incomes, while others get a huge amount of money. It is believed that

government

should regulate

this

problem. I agree with

this

statement, but there are some questions that should be considered. To start with, income does not correspond to artistic value. There are plenty of famous creators who were poor and unknown until their death.

However

, their paintings, novels and other forms of art are the treasures of modern culture. I strongly feel that

government

should allocate a budget for supporting

artists

who are starting their careers. The

second

reason is that modern wealthy

artists

are people which, by and large, work for famous customers

such

as people from the

government

or celebrities. Young masters don't have

this

opportunity.

Moreover

, many of them choose another way which allows them to express themselves without thinking of benefits. If the

government

provided help,

artists

would not strive to find rich customers and would dedicate themselves to genuine art. On the other side, it is a great challenge to develop a strategy that can tackle the unfair difference between

artists

. How to define who should be subsidized? How do distinct talented

artists

? These questions should be solved and confirmed by residents of a country on the grounds that their taxes will be the source of the payments. To sum up, I am convinced that the governments should help

artists

. If talented people got an opportunity to create and inspire others, the culture would obtain plenty of benefits.

Nevertheless

, it is important for the scheme of payments to be clear and easily accessible to every artist.