Technology is becoming progressively universal. In the fullnness of time classroom teachers will betotally substituted for technology. Do you agree or disagree?

In

this

age and day, the usage of

technology

is increasing dramatically. Even in many places around the world classrooms are managed by

technology

. From my point of

view

Add a comma

,view

show examples

I completely disagree with

this

idea that

classroom

teachers

should be substituted with

technology

.

Firstly

, one of the conspicuous limits for robotic

teachers

is the incapability of disciplining

classroom

students

.

For instance

, it is widely known kids may decide to disobey and they can't punish them.

Then

they continue to misbehave. Sadly,

this

is an issue that robotic

teachers

can't control

students

when class is going on.

Therefore

,

this

would create multiple troubles in the class space and

students

will continue to create anarchy.

Secondly

, a robotic teacher would probably have some other significant limitations during

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

teaching in the

classroom

.

For example

,

students

may want

teachers

to explain from diverse methods to learn better.

This

is a quality that human

teachers

have,

on the

contrary

Add the comma(s)

,contrary

show examples

robotic

teachers

don't have.

This

would be a problem due to the fact that kids need to have a direct connection with

teachers

to learn in different education measures adequately . It becomes apparent, robotic

teachers

are merely scheduled for presenting a distinctive means. To summarise, In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the idea that robotic

teachers

can be replaced with

classroom

teachers

. It is predicted that the adverse effects on the debate over technology_driven teaching , will always be greater than the positive effects. Because of

this

classroom

teachers

will never be substituted by

technology

.