Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

#governments #support #artists #people #waste #money

There is irrefutable evidence that many countries think that

art

is essential and must be supported, whilst others believe that it is not and

money

should be spent on more important things. ;

nevertheless

, there has been much discussion revolving around

this

issue.

Art

supporters argue that nations should support

artists

, while opponents argue that governments should spend that

money

on more important things. my perspective, I am in favour of the former view. The defenders of supporting

artists

express their views cogently. One convincing explanation in favour of artist aid is that countries' histories are brought to life via

art

, and

artists

have the ability to transfer stories from the past to pictures and show history through their

art

For instance

, there are many galleries that show the old generation's life,

such

as the Victorian era through

art

. The supporters are

also

adamant that

art

should be used to generate tourism.Some nations think that

artists

have a big role in developing their cities via design, which might help attract tourists.

For example

, in Jeddah city, there are many

art

pieces in front of the Red Sea, and thousands of people come from around King Saudi Arabia to get pictures in front of them.

Nevertheless

, there is a growing antipathy towards supporting

art

. The opponents believe that spending

money

on education is more beneficial than wasting it on

art

. Some communities think that if the government spent

money

on education, it might help develop the country. Some sceptics

also

claim that citizens need health care more than

art

. They think that affording free medicine on the ground to assist broken patinates is more important than supporting

artists

. By way of conclusion, backing

art

is a highly contentious subject. My own considered opinion is that

art

is very important for any nation and governments should support it.

Submitted by fwzeah on Tue Dec 07 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

6Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
3Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

306 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 6.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.0

Complete response

6.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 checks
Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
Unlimited Task 2 checks
Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
Personalized suggestions
Know how to boost your score.
Detailed mistakes analysis
Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
Topic ideas generator
Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
Vocabulary helper
Get the right words for any topic.
Progress tracking
Track your writing improvements.

Topic Vocabulary:

promote
culture
creativity
economic growth
tourism
social development
personal development
merit
financial support
balanced
transparent

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

5
band
Art classes, such as painting and drawing, as important to a child's development as other subjects, so it should be compulsory in high schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has become increasingly prevalent for people to accept the painting and drawing courses in high schools. Each has its own perks; thus, I partly agree with this view and discuss the reasons as follows.
5.5
band
Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some would argue that it is important to allow students to study subjects which they want in university. Others tend to think that they should study only those subjects that gives them opportunities in the future, such as science and technology. Despite the fact that these useful subjects give alumni a lot of path to create their own career with appropriate salary, I believe that every field is vital so universities should allow them to choose.
5.5
band
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Rural-to-urban migration, in many countries around the world, is leading to a decline in the countryside's population. In my opinion, this constitues a negative development with far-reaching implications. As rural areas depopulate, the social fabric weakens, vital agricultural practices diminish, and urban centres face overpopulation challenges.
4
band
Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use as everyday basics produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. TO what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Exchanges of manufactured products across countries are a great way to maintain trade relationships.
6
band
Should high school students be required to study many different subjects at the same time, or should they study only three or four subjects at a time? Do you agree or disagree?
Whether high school students should study various kinds of subjects or not seems to be controversial. There are lots of people who think that students should only pass a few courses. I disagree with this statement. High school students should choose their field of study after high school. They should have a wide point of view on various issues.

Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Fully explain your ideas

Art classes, such as painting and drawing, as important to a child's development as other subjects, so it should be compulsory in high schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use as everyday basics produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. TO what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Should high school students be required to study many different subjects at the same time, or should they study only three or four subjects at a time? Do you agree or disagree?