Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

An important amount of public money goes to cultural

activities

such

as music and theatre.

However

, it is considered, by some, unnecessary and they think

this

fund should be invested in public services

instead

. I disagree that government investment in arts is a waste. 

This

will be proven by analysing the important role which

this

sector is playing in the economy, as well as the encouragement of individuals’ creativity.

Firstly

, the role of music, movies and every

art

form is very important in any nation’s wealth.

For instance

, it is widely known that many countries depend on all types of artistic

activities

to promote their image, in fact, some artists put their home countries on the map with the popularity and influence they have

thus

boosting their tourism.

As a result

,

art

is considered a key element in any nation’s GDP.

Therefore

this

makes it clear that governments are not misspending when putting resources in

this

sector.

Secondly

, by supporting artists governments encourage individuals’ creativity.

For example

, the tech giant Apple look at

this

quality as a major asset for its prospective employees.

This

is why today’s market designers, engineers even software developers are required to have creative skills.

Thus

it is undeniably apparent that investing money in

art

is paramount. To summarise, artistic

activities

is one of the major factors in any society’s growth and it induces people to innovate and think differently in solving problems.

Therefore

, it is wrong to think that by putting taxes payers’ money into creative

activities

we are wasting it. After thorough analysis on

this

subject, it is recommended that more resources ought to be allocated to create more

art

schools and institutions.