The NRA believe more guns make the country safer. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?

The

gun

debate is very popular in certain countries, especially the USA. The right to bear arms is written into the constitution of a country and there are always be people who believe that it is in the best interest of communities and the country to have an armed population. Others claim that it adds to

gun

crime and deaths. According to my, more

guns

bring more devastation and weapons spread should be controlled through strict policies and actions. The most plausible argument that can be put in favour of

this

view is that having a

gun

in a

household

endangers children and teenagers.

This

is because adolescents do not have the requisite knowledge or maturity to handle

guns

safely.

For example

, the US Department of Justice recently revealed statistics showing that 150 American children and teenagers die each year because of accidents relating to

household

guns

.

Therefore

, it is incontrovertible that

household

guns

lead to additional shootings.

In addition

to

this

,

guns

became especially dangerous when spouses have violent arguments.

This

is because male sexual rage,

in particular

, often results in deadly aggression.

For example

, The International Crime Bureau recently produced statistical evidence that – if there is a

household

gun

– a man is twice as likely (if he discovers his wife having an affair) to kill her in a fit of jealous rage.

Therefore

,

this

also

indicates

household

guns

correlate positively with additional shootings. In conclusion, there is an undeniable fact that more

guns

lead to more destruction.

Therefore

, more legislations need to be put in place to limit

gun

use and its control.

Furthermore

, despite relying on

guns

for safety, it can rather be ensured by making law and enforcement departments stronger and effective.