A family has a great influence on children’s development, but the influence outside the home plays a bigger part in children’s life. To what extent to you agree or disagree?

It is not a secret that

such

agents of socialization as parents and the other people who surround a kid play a crucial part in the upbringing of juveniles.

Thus

, the dilemma of which of the mentioned earlier options has a greater impact on youngsters. A number of members tend to opt for the

first

choice - while other people,as well as I,

on the other hand

, support the latter alternative. Below I will explore

this

thought-provoking issue underlying the following factors: psychological aspect and time wasted. To start with, I totally agree that the peers and other individuals outside the home influence a children' development more compare to the nearest and dearest,

that is

family to be precise. To start with, if parents are constantly working, their child is likely to spend a greater amount of time with his or her peers and, as a sequence, share more thoughts and ideas that affect personal progress.

For instance

, in the film so-called "Mid 90s" a boy had spared more hours skating and expressing his feelings with his friends and,

consequently

, even his mother was surprised how they changed his personality.

In addition

, it is an often occasion, albeit not always, when kids are trying to discuss with their relatives a particular topic,

however

, after putting much effort to do it, they cope with misunderstanding due to the fact of both a big gap between generations and the way of growing up.

In particular

, in the book ",Chasodei" a girl had asked her grandmother for a piece of advice, but the latter did not manage to follow her thoughts.

That is

why the girl went to her acquaintances for help. To sum up, I would like to stress that these are people outside the family that most impact on the kids' upbringing, but not their family. The grounds for it I have mentioned above.