People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.

The environmental challenges have been a hotly-debated topic.Individuals argue that the ruling state needs to
increase
the levy charged on petroleum products that are used on motor vehicles in order to solve the challenges with the environment.In my opinion,
this
has a relative consequence both on the state and
population
. The increased price of energy consumption by motor vehicles will have enormous challenges.
Firstly
,the individuals will have to dig deep into their pockets whenever they are travelling
thus
making the
cost
of common commodities go up.
Secondly
,transportation of essential commodities will not be easy,since the
cost
is high the companies will not be able to transport the goods and services to meet the need of the growing
population
.The recent
increase
in crude oil by suppliers,
for example
, has led to soaring prices on fuel affecting at least 80% of the transport industry.
Thus
,if petroleum price increases the
cost
of living
also
escalates
consequently
cost
of life will soar for common people.
On the other hand
,exhaust fumes from transport industries are the major culprit in global warming,because the end products from the gases accumulate in the environment until they are able to mix with the particulate matters
further
deteriorating the environment.
Thus
,when the taxes are increased fewer motorists will result in few environmental effects.
Additionally
,after the
increase
in ,price the
government
will be able to collect enough revenue to cater for the needs of the
population
.
For example
,the latest report by the
government
auditor reported a 20% improvement in the
collection
.
Therefore
, an
increase
in fuel products not only reduce the environmental effects but
also
improves
government
collection
. In conclusion,
although
the high
cost
of fuel has a great negative impact on the pockets of the
population
by spending much,it
also
has a positive side on the
government
by reducing the climatic effects and increasing the total
collection
.
Therefore
the state should strike a balance on the
government
collection
on energy and expenditure.
Submitted by Sabina Hamisi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
    What to do next:
    Look at other essays: