In many countries, as people are earning more these days they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

The importance of environment, which was always debatable how to save

this

but has now more controversial with many

people

are deeming that

one

of the best ways to solve

this

problem is to raise the cost of

fuels

for cars and other transport. I completely disaccord with the statement

also

that essay will

further

elaborate my viewpoint. On

one

hand, there are myriad reasons why

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

disagree with the statement but the

first

and foremost

one

is that

price

of

fuels

occurs imbalance in society because the high

price

of

fuels

afford only high-class

people

, whereas the middle-class public cannot afford

this

Correct determiner usage

these

show examples

fuels

so it is not possible that usage of fuel reducing by

this

way.

Moreover

, civilians should focus on other alternatives

such

as e-bike as well as public transport. By

this

environment is more effective to protect them.

As a result

, long term results can be attained. Another worth considering an alternative to improve our environment which is the best way is using friendly

fuels

of automobiles. It is useful for reducing not only reducing toxic air but

also

increased levels of life.

Therefore

,

people

can live a long life without any hustle.

For example

,

people

can use automobiles like CNG and LPG These types of automobiles are considered eco-friendly fule. To conclude, according to the argument

one

can reach a conclusion I increasing

fuels

price

is not worth it to save environmental problems while using another way like e-vehicles. I can not support the increasing the

price

of

fuels

due to these reasons.