The growth of Online shopping will one day lead to all the shops in towns and cities closing. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that at a given time tele-purchasing will compel the closure of all bazaars throughout big cities and villages. Personally, I agree with the view owing to the fact that, eBay is faster and more convenient than in-person buying.

However

, it has its pitfalls.

This

essay will shed light on both sides of the statement and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, online purchasing amongst cities is becoming fast and convenient. Because of swiftness, online shoppers receive products, which makes the process reliable and worthwhile.

For instance

, a simple item bought in Europe today takes approximately a fortnight, while if one travels to the same place, it could take a month or more.

As a result

, businesses are made swiftly and customers benefited.

Moreover

,

this

is the overriding reason for the increase in online shopping throughout remote communities these days.

On the other hand

,

internet

shopping is the source of customers' deceiving.

In other words

, the growing number of websites soars a plethora of fakes

also

, misleading the overwhelming majority of online shoppers. 60% of hoodwinked clients were reported

last

year by the Guardian Newspaper at an independent inquiry made to 5000 individuals.

Hence

, a myriad of clients prefers in-person purchasing rather than through the

internet

.

Furthermore

, most conservationists businessmen abandoned online negotiation these days due to deceit. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks, which

internet

purchasing comes with, it is growing fast and it is becoming reliable and safe, enough reasons to threaten other forms of negotiations.

Therefore

, I agree with the view. I would go as far as to say, ruling power should protect

internet

vendors and clients.